Now everyone is passionate about IEO - but few understand that the exchanges impose significant financial demands on developers. Often, the money for the development of the project itself simply does not remain. ICO is a better way to raise funds, especially if the company is approved by the SEC.
If the best way to raise funds with the ICO is why do many projects with this year's IEO? some even changed from ICO sales to IEO.
IEO is a new and exciting concept. However, what is the point of doing an IEO for a project that has raised 5 million USD in private sale phase? Paying dozens of bitcoins is unecessary when Ahrvo is going to the top anyway.
Although AhrvoDEEX has raised 5 million USD in private sales but according to the IEO it is necessary because that is what many people are hunting for, I believe if the IEO is held, fundraising will increase.
Have they shared any proof of that $5 million investment? This would give me and other potential investors more confidence.
Yes, by providing the evidence, I am sure investors will be interested here, and it is good to raise $ 5 million in ICO sales.
We are open to providing evidence in the interest of transparency but that would be on an individual basis if the person were to reach out with that concern. However, we aren't in the business of posting our financial statements for obvious reasons (competition, privacy, future fundraising, etc). We will also have a press release coming in a few weeks mentioning the firms that invested specifically.
I hope you say it quickly and I can't wait for anyone who will take part in the inventory here, hopefully it is a famous person so that he can bring the name of the ArhvoDEEX project to become more famous