It's difficult to think about these things, but look at it from this perspective:
Why bother taking the thinking that far?
There's not a shred of evidence about Dave Kleiman. There's certainly not a shred of evidence about our fave hysteric. There's not a shred of evidence about any coins anywhere.
There is some evidence (or at least I read about it) that there are about 1 mil btc in the trust.
Not sure if it is correct or not, but if it is incorrect, then these Florida proceedings make no sense.
They'd have to be over some issue (which I thought is the trust). Are you saying that the issue is made up?
Since it's civil I assume anyone can accuse anyone of anything as long as they have a bit of money to get rolling.
Bingo. And the judge has to wade through shit up to his armpits.