I'm not quite sure why you're sorry, it's an opinion that holds equal weight and I sincerely appreciate the response.

If the community doesn't want to directly fund it, that's fine.. I'll decide what type of campaign I want to put together.  People joke about Dogecoin, however, there's a reason why they are kicking ass with far inferior tech. All the marketing in the world targeting nerds like us simply won't push us to that next level in my opinion. But what do I know.

Very few charities accept Bitcoin. Of those charities, most want a digital currency converted to Bitcoin before they accept it. I know, I've done this when I lead initiatives for both Feather and Peercoin. From a PR perspective, that doesn't do us much good. Having a charity that directly accepts Nxt and willing to cross promote is a different story. Being able to call my contact back from Wired and WSJ and say "Ok, now I have a story for you" is different story.

 We have a massive PR list, guess how many want to talk about Nxt outside of the hardcore crypto community? Interesting, Dogecoin gets mainstream coverage because they are seen as the non-nerd, tipping/charity currency of the Internet. When their PR people call up the different media publications, it's a much different conversation based on the marketing they've done in the past. I don't have to own any of their coins to appreciate how they are attempting to leverage themselves outside the hardcore communities.

I love charity, however, I'm taking those personal feelings out of the picture. For me, this is simply a business decision looking at ROI.  I was right about pushing conferences to start the conversation (I trained Nikel in Miami), I feel I'm right about this one as well.  

** Action **

I'll put a video together explaining the idea. Those that want to contribute, great.. those that don't, that's cool too.