Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: Hhampuz embezzling signature campaign funds from BestMixer
by
The-One-Above-All
on 29/06/2019, 10:26:04 UTC
I have no idea what you are saying. It is not a complicated concept that a person needs to pay for living expenses on an ongoing basis. It is also not a complicated concept to expect a person to not be able to use all of their income to go towards a loan.

And I have no idea why the hell are you trying to stretch it hard, very hard and push us to believe what you're trying to make us believe. You said Hhampuz had ~BTC0.54 earnings during that month + BTC0.08 extra for his signature and avatar totalling it to more than BTC0.6 (enough to repay his loan). One more thing, Hhampuz had been here and working since more than 2-3 months and if we even average his earnings out based on that (half of it each month if not full BTC0.6), he still had his money to repay his loan to DarkStar_

Quote
The loan is only evidence of a motive. There is blockchain evidence to support the underlying accusation that remains true regardless of motive.

I've the same thing here to say what suchmoon said: You're making stories here, so stop doing it (I mean stop trying it here and go, write a story like this for a movie and you may get your 100 BTC back to start your lending business back, then you may decide not to lend Hhampuz  Kiss).


I don't think we should be side tracked by speculating on "other " motives either way. People do not need an EXTRA motivation/incentive to take 0.5 btc  "for free".  Give most people here an opportunity to take 0.5 btc that is not theirs if the opportunity is there and you will see that it gets taken as could be the case here.

Saying well hhampuz "should" have the funds to repay another loan without this 0.5 BTC does not mean he is not guilty of what the initial post asserts. WHY are we allowing campaign managers in these positions that even need to take out loans? this looks like needless risk and temptation. Bring in some wealthy people who do it fairly and transparently for some "extra" non essential income. Less temptation to scam or game the entire thing and ensures fairer treatment for all those that apply for the campaign.