You have not correctly translated the Russian word "дoмыcлы".  You translate under tracing paper, losing meaning. The correct translation with preservation of meaning, not speculation, but interpretation.
Do you want to talk about the facts? I checked your charges on this case.

Date of registration.

registration date is the same in numbers for only two people. Matches only in numbers, in time does not match. The other two people do not even match the date. Conclusion, date of registration, is not evidence in this case.
MrBoston 11/13/2017 4:41:17 PM
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MrBoston
Fixxer767 11/13/2017 5:22:55 PM
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Fixxer767

Jeronimo78  11/14/2017 1:41:18 PM
https://bpip.org/search.aspx?q=Jeronimo78
Blanchrc40   11/11/2017 2:09:12 PM
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Blanchrc40

Password change date.

password change time is the same for two users with an interval of 16 minutes. Indirectly may be evidence.
MrBoston 3/25/2018 9:48:00 PM
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MrBoston
Blanchrc40 3/25/2018 9:32:14 PM
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Blanchrc40

Fixxer767 3/25/2018 10:20:35 PM the date of the password change is the same, the time does not match. Indirect weak evidence.
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Fixxer767

Jeronimo78 user date change password does not match. Also, the date of registration does not match. This cannot be evidence.
Jeronimo78 3/18/2018 4:13:10 PM
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Jeronimo78

woke up
Jeronimo78 5/9/2019 8:29:33 AM
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Jeronimo78
MrBoston   5/14/2019 9:52:40 PM
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=MrBoston
Blanchrc40 5/9/2019 8:34:21 AM
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Blanchrc40
Fixxer767 5/12/2019 11:30:10 AM
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Fixxer767

Jeronimo78 has a coincidence with one of the above. By registering and changing the password no. Based on this, I would not bind them with confidence


Comments

Comments of these users in the topic Smartman do not contain addresses, logins, other individual data. There are no reviews on cooperation with Smartman However, following only your logic, consider these comments to be interrelated. This is your interpretation, this is prejudice, but not proof.
These comments do not violate the rules.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.msg43702837#msg43702837
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.msg43790610#msg43790610
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.msg44035191#msg44035191
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.msg26771578#msg26771578
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.msg34592044#msg34592044
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.msg36061797#msg36061797
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.msg47444532#msg47444532
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.msg47476556#msg47476556

Merit

This supposed farm has no common merit, your multi-level picture is not proof for me. People who get a lot of merit are connected with many people, it may not be what you think, for me this is not proof.

Customer feedback.

 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.msg48106050#msg48106050
There is one review of poorly performed work. In the same topic, the person who left the review offers services of a higher quality, competes. I didn’t see what he was asking for money back, or talking about fraud. But I saw that you corresponded with another user. It mentions the possibility of performing WP.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2058283.msg21750927#msg21750927
http://archive.md/2sW1R

 I asked you a clarifying question several times, you left the answer.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg51603044#msg51603044

I suspect the existence of a second motive for prosecution.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5156668.msg51544427#msg51544427

The most important thing in this case. This is not a reason for changing the trust, for me. If you are confident in the evidence, submit it to the moderators. Jeronimo78 is locked. If your evidence is sufficient, Smartman falls under rule 25. This is a good way to check the quality of your facts, but this is not enough for me. If there is other evidence, you may find a connection. At the moment, you are accusing people of corruption, without evidence. You come to META to make a loud headline, and when they ask you for proof, you say; - "I have compiled a questionnaire for you, answer 4 questions" ... If you have no evidence, you can only assume and then your survey and questions will be relevant if you ask politely.
But you have already left a review Smartman, he has the right to challenge him.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1090672
Reference https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg51607143#msg51607143
This is on your conscience. What questions to me? we have a different understanding of the evidence base


You also slandered me.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5156668.msg51544427#msg51544427

I see an increase in harassment and false accusations, interspersed with insults and pressure. I think this is the work of several people. At first disputes were fought around BTC, now personal attacks began.