Re: Flagging user broke an agreement and leaking confidential information

Quote from: xtraelv on June 30, 2019, 10:24:46 AM

The conversation as posted by the OP https://i.imgur.com/HGZCFtT.jpg

The quoted part is before the rest of the conversation which clearly shows that there was no acceptance yet of mutually agreed terms.

https://i.imgur.com/rBGZBdB.png

Shows the seller accepts taking the risk.

https://i.imgur.com/0hD2FrX.png

Asking for proof. No acceptance has been made.

https://i.imgur.com/WJV6I2A.png

Shows the seller is not convinced there has been acceptance.

https://i.imgur.com/bMy0NvD.png

No proof of ownership - terms not met - no acceptance yet.

https://i.imgur.com/gSpI4l2.png

Quality not accepted - no acceptance yet.

https://i.imgur.com/jANNM66.png

End of conversation that was posted - where seller asks to "wait". No acceptance yet of mutually accepted terms.

What comes before and after the highlighted agreement is irrelevant. What you say before and after a contract does not invalidate a contract made some time between those two periods because further discussion or terms were had. A contract was technically formed, by your own clearly stated metrics, and by the information bob123 himself provided as I covered above. The instant the seller PMed bob123 a contract was formed because that act was the first act of stipulated consideration after terms were discussed and mutually agreed to.