Even supposing that it was true, which it is not, then who gives a shit about original intentions.
You seem to be implying that the arbiter of what things are named is merely a popularity contest. I do not agree.
That is the power of the market. The market has already chosen. BCH / BSV / Bitcoin Unlimited / Bitcoin United / Bitcoin whatever have all lost.
You can call brute force economics a popularity contest if you like, but that moniker will only stick if it is sufficiently popular.