No. That would be religuous. In this space where people present single observations based on opinion without any statistical value as facts, it would be foolish to believe anyone. Do you believe that The Forecaster movie is anything other than what is widely seen as a name clearing platform, orchestrated by Armstrong himself?

I acknowledge facts only. There needs to be evidence that the record was produced to a large audience when the prediction was made, before the event, not after it. Very simple. Check the Wikipedia entry for Martin Armstrong and you get a fairly good picture. If you follow the Wikipedia sources about the 1987 crash forecast, you will see that even Wikipedia is not correct. The so-called forecast was after the event. Accurracy is very important here. Some time in the future perhaps someone will set the record straight. I have seen that over time, Wikipedia entries become more accurate, more specific, more nuanced because people add their wisdom.

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.