Re: Supporting of shitposting by merit source is it trustworthy?
It's "balls", not "eggs", and the rest of your out-of-context-poorly-translated accusation is not much better either.
Why not bells? 
In any case, you can check everything yourself. It is a pity that you did not do this in the previous topic, everything ended up very interesting.
Many other examples are missing quotes too, plus the awful translation, plus you have to keep in mind that many of these come from the Russian equivalent of the Wall Observer thread - context matters a lot there. Don't fall for these tricks.
I quoted words that were written by those who received merit. It is a fact. What a person quotes does not apply to the content that he produces. The context of the messages can be checked by anyone, this is open information and I have provided links to it.Don't fall for the OP's dirty tricks. chimk is an excellent merit source.
YepQuote
Top senders to permabanned users, last 180 days
239: chimk
115: dbshck
82: suchmoon
50: djnocide
chimk =~ top2+top3+top4239: chimk
115: dbshck
82: suchmoon
50: djnocide