Ok I'm tired.
You're denying the problems of home schooling.
You're denying the reality of gender theory (which is just based on genetics you know, not really a science I guess).
You're denying the necessity and existence of social construct.
You're denying the difference between nature vs nurture debate (what behavior are linked to biology, what behavior is linked to environment and education, this one is not settled) and the environment vs self importance debate (our existence is more determined by our environment or our own characteristics, this debate is settled since the 20th).
You're denying the FACT that the article YOU presented is 80% testimonials, the lamest possible argument, or more precisely you're denying it's important.
You're denying the self indoctriment of individuals and families.
You're a moron. I can't discuss with you simply because you don't present facts, you present vague impressions like "This is why home schooling is important, because no one will care for your own children more than you do" which is not only wrong but also evade the little bit of social mixety importance.
In your ideal home schooling system, religion will spread like wildefire and what and who you are will be based ONLY on who your parents are. Beautiful.
You're too stupid or too fanatic to even think about the weaknesses of your opinions.
You never cease to be entertaining. If you will notice you didn't actually respond to any of my points, you just pointed out I disagree with you in the form of straw manning and speaking for me followed by some ad hominem attacks. Gender theory is not based on genetics, it is based on "Critical Theory" and Marxism. Just because I don't think social constructs are 100% of what determines certain factors of human behavior doesn't mean I deny it exists or is needed.
"You're denying the difference between nature vs nurture debate (what behavior are linked to biology, what behavior is linked to environment and education, this one is not settled) and the environment vs self importance debate (our existence is more determined by our environment or our own characteristics, this debate is settled since the 20th)."
I can only assume through this poorly constructed verbiage you are trying to make an argument for collectivism over individualism. This debate is by no means settled either. I suspect you are simply confusing your self with similar arguments, but somewhat unrelated context to the original debate of gender being a social construct or a matter of genetics (nature vs nurture). I would assume this unless you are arguing genetic differences between men and women don't exist "because Communism".
I didn't deny anything about the article, I pointed out that the subject matter is inherently subjective and anecdotal. All you are doing is pointing out the obvious, creating another straw man, and speaking for me.
You are off topic on this homeschooling rant anyway, you asked how I thought best to limit extremism and I replied. Your assumptions about "religion spreading like wildefire" are based on nothing and not as much of a big deal as you think it is anyway. I might also point out just because a lot of home schooled kids have religious parents doesn't mean home schooling makes people more religious. Furthermore, who the fuck do you think you are demanding that parents submit their children to the state for indoctrination anyway? If they want to raise their children religious that is their business. People raising their children to be religious is horrible to you but mutilating the genitals of children and chemically castrating them is fine?