I just recently rarely deeply conduct investigations, there is no time for that. Therefore, when you raised this question for the first time, I did not see a reason to lower the trust. Why do I need to dig deep? Do you think I have little suspicion accumulated all the time? A lot, but I do not have time to check everyone deeply. Evidence appeared only on June 30th. I am not the only person on the forum who is able to evaluate your facts. And you could see that no one was in a hurry to lower the trust. You can continue to impose my opinion on me, but I have my own opinion on the evidence and the use of the trust system.

I did not confess to the unreasonable report, I do not think moderators are fools. In the Russian section, these issues are discussed very actively, KTChampions said that he had not seen individual consideration of issues before. I gave him an example that all questions are individually considered. I made a lot of reports on it, according to the paragraphs of the rules No. 32, No. 1 and 1 report No. 33. There was no reference to the source. The report received the status of "good" and the message was deleted. There was no blocking, it is a clear example of an individual approach, which, as KTChampions argued, is missing. I'm wondering what prevents people from putting the link?  The list of blocked in the Russian section
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4588431.0

Quote from the rules in Russian: -
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=994018.0

Yes, an active discussion began in the Russian section. Yesterday another accusation was made https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg51681196#msg51681196 just follow the indictment links to see that the torn quotes do not reflect the context. I had to clarify https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.msg51685665#msg51685665
at the same time read what people wrote.

I will analyze for you one accusatory link

3 merit.

The author asked when I plan to transfer BNB to BTC. I answered him that I want to wait for a higher course
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1006631.msg50662797#msg50662797
Then I thought, and I suddenly realized that it was impossible to be greedy and we must convert it into BTC right now, the exchange rate was approximately 0.004 sat on April 18, 2019. It was an experience I gained. I thanked the author, who pushed me to this and sent him merits to the beginning of the discussion.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1006631.msg50664365#msg50664365
on such facts was built the last accusation. It was called a crap post, with merit assigned.
Messages to which merit is assigned are not low-content. They are part of the discussion and were the "address" for the appropriation of merit in these discussions. But the content is different in quality. I gave an explanation for each message in the Russian section

You can also see the users who are assigned the maximum amount of merit, it will be clear that these are well-deserved and beneficial authors, to whom not only I give merit.
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=chimk
 I used to keep statistics on which sections and for which questions merit was assigned. Coverage is high. I know the benefits of the forum, users with the maximum amount of merit. This I can also explain, it is not difficult. Content is different and technical and ideological. And BTC and altcoins and much more. The quality of the content does not depend on me, I’m not the one who writes. I check for plagiarism. Profiles I study whenever possible.

I received private messages several times and asked "can they give me a merit?". I always answered: - "I do not need merit, send to useful users." I am toxic, people communicate with me carefully, knowing that I am a target for attacks and for them there may be consequences. It seems to me.
Also in the Russian section there is a topic for messages that have no merit. There you can see and appreciate them. I am not the only source, there are a few more. The whole community is a link in the movement of merit within the network. If I did not give them to someone, maybe in this profile there is a reason for this, plagiarism, possible fraud or something else. This is all in the Russian section is now being discussed. But they called me a corrupt source. There is no evidence.

I still do not know in what format to reflect this situation, it raises many questions, but you need to understand. I received a lot of serious accusations, it can not constantly go on. In the near future I will gather all the important information together. Yesterday I again had to write a large text, exposing another lie. See a discussion of these issues.