1. He refuses to be transparent regarding his selection process for his sig campaigns. Thus opening himself, his projects and those he employs open to criticism and doubt. Putting the entire board at possible risk under certain conditions. WHY NOT BE TRANSPARENT??
Signature campaign selections don't need to be transparent. "Putting the entire board at possible risk" seems like you're seriously hyperbolizing the direness of the situation. If they're hired, they're hired.
Quality of a participant is the most important thing but I don't expect Hhampuz to give me a detailed breakdown of how he gauges quality and how every single participant was selected. That would be ludicrous.
3. There is a matter of 0.5btc possibly being stolen from a project that he was working with. He has not answered to clear this matter up even if it is not true. The truth is still not known.
Contrived accusations through assumptions via circumstantial evidence are interesting... but answering every accusation is quite a chore especially for someone so "popular".