Hhampuz is perhaps not look quite as bad as the other 2. But until the "truth" is known regarding the 0.5btc then it is best not to make any assumptions either way
So then there we have it. No more regurgitated discussion because that's all we'll have without Hhampuz's reply... which I don't expect to come any time soon.
You can start the precedence of assuming guilt based on unanswered accusations now if you'd like.
What makes you assume we believe he is guilty? you are seemingly trying to put words in our mouth. We believe it "looks" bad but could have a believable and reasonable answer that would demonstrate it to be other wise.
We clearly said that in light of the OTHER instances of behavior that are far from optimal this should merely be NOTED down for further investigation at another time. Or to form part of the context in the future.
We believe that the reader should make up their own minds, but do so in the context of the other instances of sub optimal and what some would certainly term shady or untrustworthy behavior.
We believe it is possible or perhaps even probable but nobody knows hhampuz reason for liberating or moving the btc away from that address. Only hhampuz knows and he is choosing to remain silent. That is his own choice.
Are you claiming to believe he is innocent without doubt?
Do you consider the supporting of doxing a forum treasurer a good thing?
Are you claiming that OTHER MEMBERS have not been given scam tags for FAR LESS?
Previously DT would likely just say, tell us what happened or red tag time. You know this attack first before the proof/explanation to protect others theory.