There has been a revival of activity on some projects who had gone cold with little to no activity on their different media channels during the crypto winter - leaving their own communities clueless on the status of these projects. I thought it would be good if the crypto-community would be more aware of this because it could be a red flag and a sign that these projects don't really care about their stakeholders.
Yes, I have already seen several resumed fundraising projects of ICO, which have already conducted their own ICOs. If they simply did not raise enough funds for their project or suspend it, then I dont see anything wrong here. Even good projects during the bear market could not collect even the minimum amount.
However, I was recently surprised when I saw that the Taklimakan campaign, which last year conducted the ICO and issued its TKLN tokens, and which I received for signing up for the campaign, signed the ICO, again began to raise funds. It is really necessary to beware.