I have no doubt that the many reputable people would do a great job. We, however, have a culture clash here. By law, we need to do KYC on anyone offering a financial type service. By culture, no one offering such a service is going to provide the information we require. To hand over private information for a few lousy bucks is not worth it to them (I would not do it) and for us to do business with a third party for a few lousy bucks and break our contracts, is not worth it either.
So it will be better for everyone if we start our campaign small and show that we are trustworthy.
I don't understand why you are failing to understand this simple logic. Game-protect guy is a fuckin idiot and multiple people including myself have spoken against him. He is unstable and clearly not the right person to act as an authoritative figure to protect anyone's money let alone be an escrow. He can't be trusted. You can pick literally anyone else with hundreds of time better reputation than him and the odds are that you'd be able to KYC them. It's not about culture clash, you are only making it look like that.