Well, thank you atleast for assuring us of the legitimacy of the project. Everyone is indeed entitled to his/her opinion but at thesame time don't give somebody the opportunity to take a bad view of your project. Always update your followers to create the consciousness of the project.
That doesnt look good for ICOholder platform. Some projects dont have so much funding for promotions, and have to make just the important promotions. Ill expect ICO review platforms to be neutral and take no side. Ill always stick to DYOR. Works for me.
ICO review site is very popular and they make huge money out of these extensive review. Also they check the team and performances. So we really cannot take this light and investors also dont take it light. Team should act promptly and make the things right now.
There's no doubt that this project is good with high prospects but at thesame time they should learn to maintain the flow with their community of followers because when there's a collapse of communication, then people necessarily begin to make assumptions that may/may not be true but that cannot happen when there's a bridge between the both parties