~
I know what the topic is, I created the thread. You clearly didn't have anything to say about it and posted there just because babo mentioned your sockpuppeting, a surprisingly touchy subject for you even though everybody knows you're cryptohunter.
Anyway, your rants and whines about unrelated users are off topic. You can create your own thread you feel the need to vent about that. Quit shitposting in my threads and we'll get along just fine since I'm ignoring you most of the time anyway.
Those are your assumptions for which there can be NO PROOF. We formed a sensible rebuttal to the FALSE ASSUMPTIONS AND CLAIMS that were be published as a valid reason to support your THREAD TITLE and CENTRAL POINT that QS is dangerous to deal with.
There is no MANDATORY requirement for anyone to mention the EXACT incidents you present in the initial post to remain on topic. So long as they are supporting or denying or questioning your central point and presenting valid reasons for their point of view the reader deserves the opportunity to have access to that information to ensure they are forming the optimal opinion.
That idiot was in our opinion using bogus information (at face value) and certainly in our opinion inappropriate comparisons to form a basis for his support for your central point. We had every right to form a counter argument or opinion to his support of your CENTRAL POINT.
You are clearly wrong and regarding our motivation for posting. It was not because we object to being called the true legend of cryptohunter at all. We are flattered by this. We simply wanted to demonstrate that his reasoning for supporting your central point was bogus and flawed and should certainly be brought into context.
If a person even wished to debate on your thread what you "term" as dangerous compared to what you consider "safe" to the point of being on DT they are within their rights to do so under permitted flow. Unless you want to deceive and mislead the reader.
It was wrong to delete the post without deleting the post by babo ... even then neither are off topic really since they have STRONG connection to your Central point.
If you want to create a comparison thread between QS and lauda worm tongue (your old dt include and pal) then go ahead. the reader can then compare what you call dangerous to what you think is SAFE and worthy of a TRUST POSITION. This is what the reader deserves to know before taking your definition of dangerous at face value.
Either stop pushing double standards here and supporting scum bags or we will be finding your threads and making sure the reader is privy to the FULL context and all relevant and on topic information so they are not deceived.
We don't report your on topic relevant posts, you're just a pussy who knows we can debunk your specious nonsense and fear fair open debate.
We will only get along fine when you are not trying to game and weaponize broken systems for your own ends. Meet us in fair open debate or get lost. Stop snitching on minor crap you pathetic little weasel.