Based on your recent posts, it is very clear that you would be more than happy to keep their signature on if the campaign would continue.
Yes, that's exactly right. Because you know why? I don't consider 1 complaint by 1 user a good enough reason to trash an exchange of Livecoin's magnitude, longevity, and standing.
Look at what this thread is filled with: 12 pages of various DTs and wannabees hemming and hawing over the issue and zero other _actual_ victims. I've given red trusts to scammy exchanges before BUT only after it was apparent they had scammed multiple users.
I provided links to several other complaints about Livecoin. You're focusing on the OP, but to me, Livecoin's confirmed practice of permanently disabling wallets in these situations is scam behavior. Doing so causes the market to price in their insolvency. This effectively passes on all losses to depositors, who are left holding worthless un-backed tokens on Livecoin that can't be withdrawn. That's why XMR is 70% cheaper than everywhere else.
The Monero scandal is much bigger than the Monacoin one. A year later, with Livecoin still pointing the finger at Monero's developers, I think we can conclude that they will never repay their XMR depositors. More than 15K XMR was stolen in the attack -- $1.8 million at the time -- which suggests
even more XMR was stolen by Livecoin from their depositors when they permanently disabled withdrawals. There are complaints all over the internet, so please don't act like they must be confined to this thread for you to acknowledge their existence.