Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
ediface
on 10/07/2019, 12:29:13 UTC
Thank you for the help.  Isn't the 9/29/2017 COST a failed bullish reversal because the reversal is 164.96 and the closing on 9/29/2017 was 164.29.  Also 81.74 for the 7/29/2016 SPY seems way to low to be a monthly bullish reversal since SPY closed at 217.12 on that date.

Yep, copy and paste errors. Those were the same values as the row above. So COST reversal is $159.81 and SPY is $2134.73 which have been updated. Those didn't have an impact on the returns though since that's just reference data.