Bumping this because I am not satisfied with answers posted by the-one-above-all. I believe you had enough time to go trough trust feedback, can you come here and clarify questions asked a month ago?
1. you first examine the trust abuse against our own account. If you can find no direct instances of scamming people out of money or goods or trying to then you will do your best to encourage these trust abusers to remove their abuse or you will counter it.
2. If you are unable to ascertain which red tags they are (the clue is all of them) then you are obviously not cut out for the union. I mean there is no point people joining if they are unsure of what is scamming people out of money or goods or directly attempting to scam them out of money and goods IS? I mean you can not help support a movement that wants to ensure people are not accused of things they are not guilty of if you are unable to understand the basic principles.
3. Actually most of our "feedback" is observable untrue since the very wording of their trust abuse describes actions that are false.I mean the difference between vods feedback and the others feedback is contradictory and laughable ...
We may check back here to appraise your progress from time to time. Although not that often since we are busy with more important matters. There is some grass that we like to watch grow and some paint that we like to watch dry ... all these exciting and far more involving challenges.