I'm not a donkey who needs a carrot in front of nose! For now, they need to return my btc and the other coins they are holding hostage to make me delete everything I have said aгbout Mona situation. Next, if they actually don't have Mona coins, they have to clearly explain the situation but not sending me to seek answers from the developer. They should be communicating respectfully, like a professional stock exchange. Let your colleagues from Livecoin know that they need to keep an open dialogue with me.
I bet it will be interesting for you to read what other people say about them in the Russian branch of the forum.


Translate

- I clearly explained in Russian (and why?) that Mona has been stolen by the hacker.
- Don't you get it?

Yeah, "eaten by mice...” (c)

Lady, if a hacker steals 1.0 xmr from you, you may seek for help from the law enforcement or not, it’s your personal choice...

In this case, the client's funds were snitched... There is only one way the exchange does not have to turn to the law enforcement agencies, if they are ready to compensate for personal losses
I'll speak honestly, this exchange only reported to the forkway and the League of sexual reforms but not to the police. Two simple reasons are behind this - - their fear of conduct
standard procedures and audit. The second reason is, of course, the "specifics” of the exchange business in terms of licensing and registration.

NO ONE (except the owners) has any idea of what kind of hole this is, where it came from and how it changes with time.
Most likely this hole appeared on a peak of financial turnovers, when there were plenty of funds. Why would not they take a small part of these funds for the exchange development, costumer attraction, erasing blockchain and resting from all the hard work they have done?
After a while, the market started to fall, the exchange’s financial turnovers went down and their customers started leaving to Binance for example, etc. So, a relatively small hole in balance turns out to be huge in relation to new realities. Everything is so predictable. What will save from the audit? That's right, a fire. Therefore the exchange suffered from hacker attacks several times. There were no appeals to the law enforcement agencies. Legally, there is not or was not any theft. Blocking/suspending of clients' funds is a 100% scam.
The users of this exchange should start thinking about it... We can see that this is the second time when clients suffer from such episodes. Those, who organize attacks on the blockchains are always tied to the main point - the funds withdrawal. As we can see, both times the funds are leaked through this unregulated and unregistered exchange. Need any more comments?
ll tell you more, none of non-regulated exchanges have 100% reserved, because the likelihood of 100% withdrawal of the clients assets is minimal.
Now, if we will see an appearance of a representative with a shady registration (a homeless person, for example), we must be very careful and make sure to check what kind of business they claim and where they were registered.
Only scam exchanges continue to use their clients’ money, after lying to them, and dare to ask the clients to rub their noses in the bullshit (illegal) user agreement.