You are continuing with balant and false accusations by continuing to make false assumptions.
With the same assumption as yours. must we say ;  "Who are these guys who supported the flag? Did you pay them for feedback or what?"

Few public content being copied in the whitepaper for the reader to easily grasp the idea doesn't make the project a dishonest scheme.

The guys supporting the flag must be people who believe in the team, roadmap and the vision of the project. They could be as wise as the ones who support the motion. We didn't mention baseless assumptions that the ones who have flagged us are paid for their personal gains.

We understand that you are here to moderate and create a better community. You must acknowledge that we are here with the vision of a more connected world where things are fair and transparent for the benefit of all.