Your proposal is stupid. It only seems a sensible proposal to those as low functioning as yourself. You see the problems is very simple. A "useless" post to a person who is thick-as-shit (such as yourself) is likely a HIGHLY VALUABLE contribution to those that have the ability to understand the relevant and on topic valid and independently verifiable points that posters such as ourselves are capable of making.

For instance - let us say we challenge you to bring here now even 1 post of our own where the central point was debunked. Go find it csmonkey and then present the clear analysis you have applied to it to demonstrate it is INCORRECT and that you can debunk it.

If you can do so (which you will not) then we will set you to find another 20 or so of them (still less than 5% of our posts) that you can demonstrate are incorrect also.

You see your brain is not capable of grasping that you are the USELESS and net negative member. Merely a shit munching fool trying to feltch away at the ass pipes of those you hope may shart some merit into your eager face so that you can spam your sig for a slightly higher rate.

If you really care what is best and optimal for the forum then just delete your account and never return. Also make sure anyone with close genetic links to yourself is also prevented from joining.

Your proposal is simply an attempt to silence those that you can not win debates or arguments with because you lack the intelligence to do so. If you can not debunk their central points then it your own posts that are useless and devoid of any value. Like the initial post you just made.

Let's rather scrape away the bottom feeders and morons (csmiami and other such dirt) who proliferate observably incorrect garbage like the initial post and kick off all the sig spammers who are only here for financial reasons and not because they are genuine enthusiasts that wish to help build the end to end decentralized and trustless arena the REAL ENTHUSIASTS want to see completed.

Free speech is the ONLY way forward for this movement, transparent and open debate. Peoples opinions directly related to the initial post/central point of any thread should be left in tact. If during the thread you can not debunk their points that are in opposition to your own then it is likely that your own points are garbage.

We think you should post your 5 BEST original thought inspiring posts so we can take a look at the output from one that seeks to judge others value here. Or will we be able to pull them to pieces as USELESS dirt?

DT (dirty turds) have a high concentration of idiots and those that have directly financially motivated dirt on them. I would not seek to use their opinions as some valid benchmark that does not require closer analysis. It seems we have started to see a shift of the most dirty and corrupt leaving DT1 but that is just a good start , these turds seem to be clinging though to DT2 which is worrying. These DINGLEBERRIES need to be flushed totally not still having their corrupt trust abuse hanging around stinking up the place.

Using DT as some kind of "must be correct" benchmark is not going to wash around here after the flagrant abuse of the trust system for so long, their OWN observable dirty histories in many cases and the fact one by one they are requesting to leave so their behaviors are not under such scrutiny.

People complaining about retaliatory feedback better make sure they have not used "feedback" as their own kind of retaliation for simply not winning an argument on thread or not appreciating someones opinion that they could not debunk. Or to try and silence whistle blowing.

The trust system is to warn people about direct financial risk and danger ONLY. If you use it for any other reason then you can not moan about getting retaliatory feedback without demonstrating clear double standards.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TLDR - debunk their on topic relevant points or accept it is your own points that are likely the low value noise. Csmiami is clearly low functioning, ignore anything he says. He is suggesting crushing free speech and ensuring group think.