If you're in the middle of an ocean, what do you see?
If you're at the summit of Mount Everest, what do you see?
If we were on the moon, what do we see? Must we trust what we see behind the lens of our eyes or should we trust behind another lens from the camera?
If you're at the summit of Mount Everest, what do you see?
If we were on the moon, what do we see? Must we trust what we see behind the lens of our eyes or should we trust behind another lens from the camera?
^^^ Exactly!
What scientists have done is to take loads of things we see, and add to them loads of practical findings (math and physics), and put them all together. The result is the standard understanding of globe earth and the way the universe exists in their general descriptions.
Flat earth science is incomplete, and has contradictions that are far greater than the few seeming contradictions in standard science. Much of what the FE people talk about doesn't have anything to do with FE. In addition, their magnification of certain anomalies in standard math and science is extremely outweighed by anomalies and contradictions in FE science.
To maintain the idea of flat earth, FE people simply use focus in an unfair and incorrect way, to make it seem like FE is the way things exist. Why? Three basic reasons:
1. Limited thinking ability;
2. Religious-like zealousness;
3. Trolling;
... 4. Any combination of the above 3.
