Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Large Bitcoin Collider Thread 2.0
by
mrxtraf
on 14/07/2019, 14:54:11 UTC
Is it real?

Yes, spellchecking is real. ... In some parts of this planet at least.


Quote
An so spead 48-50Mkeys/sec!
For that matter already, the LBS also does not find everything, but only from the list given to him. And how much is there given to him? 100K addresses? 200? 300?

I thought I mentioned beyond reasonable doubt: 16M addresses - those that have at least 1 Satoshi on them.

Quote
Well, well, you can even specify a couple of millions through the bloom filter. But there are currently about 400 million known addresses!
And to check every address on the block, even if your ABD is raised, then the speed will be completely different, much less.

Last time I checked there were 270M known addresses, but maybe that is bigger now. So?

People usually don't want to search for empty addresses. For the topic of finding collisions, it would actually be preferable to look up all of them (and an instant speedup factor of ~20) and these proposals have been made. Maybe in the next version of LBC.

I don't know what ABD is, sorry.

Sorry. Not ABD. Is it ABC https://www.bitcoinabc.org/ . Upped full node and checking present address in DB.
After all, even those 16 million which are now incorporated in the LBC, in a month are not entirely relevant. That is, to talk about 100 percent coverage is not entirely correct.
But the conversation is not about that. Just where was the conclusion that the bitcrake checked not all the addresses?
In may 2019 i calculate address. Found 496 millions. But this and simple 1, and multi 3 addresses.