Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Game-protect flag
by
Initscri
on 15/07/2019, 07:52:04 UTC
Honestly, don't feed into his shit. Keep it professional, something which he is not. He's a troll. He'll keep trolling until he gets banned (if that happens)
This is pathetic. I woke up with a fresh mind earlier then I saw these false feedback in my feedback page. Now I feel angry and upset. This fuck ruined my morning. I hope mod teach him a lesson if possible or I may learn to avoid him. The upsetting thing is that I can not avoid the false feedback they left.


People who are not familiar with his nonsense they will think I am really a child abuser. This is a very serious accusation against anyone under any law.

Honestly, don't feed into his shit. Keep it professional, something which he is not. He's a troll. He'll keep trolling until he gets banned (if that happens)
This user should actually be banned for abusing the feedback system like this.

Pretty sure that leaving so many retaliatory ratings based on nothing falls under trolling. Especially when the accusations are this serious.

Quote
However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense ("obviously false nonsense" to an outsider, NOT to someone who follows or is involved in the discussion) just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. Such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report though (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).
I'm pretty sure this takes the cake.


Yea, I completely agree. It's absolutely annoying. I mean, I've received 9 negative reps from the guy when I had otherwise perfect trust before. It definitely wasn't a fun a time seeing the 9 negative reps.

But, at the end of the day, I know the mods probably have a massive amount of trust abuse to contend with. I do think the mods should seriously consider action on GP though; even just to set a precedent.

Suggesting people are involved in "illegal" activities without any proof was defamation enough, but bringing child accusations into it... that's a whole new level.