For me, it doesn't really matter who satoshi is as long as he never comes back. He/she/they could be anyone, literally, and if they decide to come back without us knowing that they were some super shady, nefarious beings then I guess it's game over. Personally, as long as the protocol works perfectly and the visions of Satoshi is fulfilled, we can let them be and just continue with what we're doing while we're at it and improve the system if there needs something to be improved. But of course, we should always recognize what he/she/they did, and we can do that without constantly asking their real identity is because that's their right after all.
its not about if it dosent matter or not,
at last if people interesting what goes on the web and what the root cause for something on the web they need put the right info rather then create fictions and silly post and other shit.
there are tons out there projects that done on th web which all of them under one name...
just know wiki leaks works in this manner -- under one name which lead no where
and a lot of people that behind wiki leaks hinted about bitcoin tech is coming they also hinted about cicada 3301,
the problem is the people is far away from be educated to trace simple things here its more medium stuff ,
and when you trace it right its interesting ...
for example ALL THIS FORUM AND NO BODY CAN FIND THIS LLINK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not to mention the paper that closely resembles an outline of Bitcoin having been written up in 1996 by the NSA.
https://archive.org/details/CryptographyOfAnonymousElectronicCashIN ICO phase one of the recommendations was to make sure the team was well known before buying, as an anonymous team would indicate suspicion. Yet somehow Satoshi team escaped this suspicion even though nobody knows who they are.