Say hypothetically - DarkStar_ failed to spot it that this account was hacked. He lent the money and they found out that kenzawak hacked. kenzawak later recover his account.
What happen with the money that was lent?
Partially my fault, partially kenzawak's fault (after all, they got hacked twice in a short period of time). I'd probably ask for half from him, he'd state that he's not here to trade and deny all responsibility despite being on DT1 with positive trust feedback. We'd carry on with life afterwards.
I excluded kenzawak after the first hack and I would suggest everyone do that. We need better opsec in DT.
Agreed.
Would it be wrong to leave a negative trust feedback afterwards, now that negative trust doesn't mean that someone is a scammer? The text says:
You think that trading with this person is high-risk.
I don't think it's unreasonable to believe that trading with kenzawak is high risk given that they were hacked twice in a short period of time and refused to take any responsibility the first time (and clearly didn't seem to improve their opsec either)