I said shit before this was defined. Fucking all these additions like trust shit and their rules.
I was one of the main culprits tagging shitposters before the merit system was implemented. It was never a good use of the trust system, and I knew that at the time--but the situation was so out of control that I felt I had to use the tools at my disposal, and the trust system was pretty much the only one I (and actmyname) had. I haven't negged a shitposter since then, and I've removed all the negs I'd left. Not sure why you're bitter now, because spammers/shitposters aren't getting tagged that I know of.
Feel free to leave the forum if you do not like its systems.
Eh, that's one solution but I respect people who complain about things as long as those complaints are at least semi-reasonable. If nobody complained, there would be no progress and there would be a lot of bottled-up anger.
risked BTC is no more.
That was a good move on Theymos's part to get rid of that field. I think it got abused more so than used properly. That information can be written right in the feedback itself.
You have pages and pages and pages of sent feedback, you are telling me you went through all of it and removed all of the negatives you left for shitposters How long did they take you?
The risk BTC option should have be removed or updated a long time ago, 50 BTC risked added another feedback score but that feature was added when BTC was suuuuuper cheap.