Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: BTC Gamble Pro - Artificial Intelligence Gambling System, Roulette and Dice Game
by
bones261
on 19/07/2019, 20:42:34 UTC
Quote from: BTCGamblePro on July 19, 2019, 08:00:21 PM
Quote from: bones261 on July 14, 2019, 05:04:57 AM
Quote from: BTCGamblePro on July 14, 2019, 04:16:26 AM
Hello Bones, did you let us a nevative trust review on bitcointak just because 2 link are not working on our site ?

Seriously? BTW how is your free trial going ?
  Yes, when I registered the account, it had me agree to terms of service. However, no terms of service is available, so who knows what I end up agreeing to. (I'll assume that I am agreeing to nothing, since that is what the link goes to.) Also, I mentioned in your support chat over 24 hours ago that these links appear to be broken to both the terms of service and privacy policy. I was told the dev team will get on it right away. It seems like any easy fix, if the documents truly exist. Also, I find it strange that the only place on your web site that even offers these links is on the registration page. I would think links to such important documents would be available on the bottom of your main page.

   I have been trying out your "advance" AI algorithm. It is clear that it is only a variation on the Martingale strategy.

Hello Bones, Do you mind to share your results with the 3 day access to the platform ? I saw in my records you had a great time Smiley

If you  want to continue testing you can still be elegible for a 1 week free membership, just let me know.

 Also now that we had explaine to you that our service had no term of service apart from our refund policy, do you mind to consider  updating your trust review for us, since its 100% and only based no available  terms of service.



      Please have your web development team remove the dead links and I will consider removing support for the flag and remove the negative comment. People should not have to check a box stating they accept terms of service that do not exist, to register with your sight. It is irregular. Unfortunately, with the flag, it also has support from another person, and I doubt that they will consider removing their trust comment or support for the flag. I cannot delete a flag.

     Furthermore, it does appear that your progressive betting algorithm was successful for my limited sessions. However, as with all progressive betting schemes, there is always a risk of ruin. In the end, the house has an advantage that cannot be overcome with any progressive betting scheme. Any particular reason that you changed the recommended settings for dice from 1.2 to 1.5? Was it because it is more likely that your algorithm will appear to work when someone bets 1.2 instead of 1.5, (less risk of ruin with ~80% chance to win rather than 66% chance to win each bet.) and you can get more believers in your system?