Wearing a signature is not directly advertising the site, one can wear even without the knowledge of the site and one can wear to support because in his experience, he never have had any problem with the site.
Yes, this is a another way around to think, but this sweet theory never/rarely happens, and I can bet my horse that not even single person there has been here to sever the forum for good as there greed/need for BTC dust surely outweigh there ethics. ( This is in reference to the applications until now on the campaign thread ).
A person should have due knowledge about the service they are advertising in there signature space, if there signatures promotion is polluting the community, it make the user advertising it untrustworthy too.
So wearing a signature is directly advertising the site.So this one person's scam accusation is enough for the community to conclude that Livecoin is a scam, isn't that fair?
If you walk down a restaurant, order some food and later you find out that there was a fly or something in your food, would you start comparing it with others and if others have received decent food, would you just stay quite and eat the food with the fly?? No, you would just bang the resto owner, tell 10s of your friends that the resto is shit never visit again and try to warn more and more people's.
This goes same with the accusation, one person doesn't matter, it's about how they react to it, and we expect the same from them in the future. So, if they are locking users funds now for accusing them publicly, they are sure to do the same with others in the future. Who knows who would get a fly in his food next time !
I don't think red tagging them for this is the right way to react as we would destroy too much repo around, but other reputed campaign managers here could surely start blacklisting them atleast until there current accusation is solved as yahoo62278 suggested and sooner or later they would be left with shitposters IMO.