Re: which type of blockchain you think will solve scalability,

If you just care about transactions per second, you shouldn't use nano, but Visa. Faster more reliable and stable, tested, etc
If you care about decentralization, really being the owner of your funds, and giving back financial power to individuals, bitcoin no doubt.

Scalability is just a problem to be solved if people are using the network. People are not using nano or bch

what load of shit in your post.

transactions per second its the most important metric in this field ask any expert in blockchain, how you want to replace visa if it not scale.

this is what experts try to solve, so much bullshit in your post and sorry to say you far away from be educated in this space for sure.

if crypto wanna be main stream its must to scale the tps, imagine only the cars in the usa pay for gas/fuel in crypto on a basis how much transactions per second it will be.

You appear to be missing some of the nuance being explained to you here. There are compromises that need to be made if you place all your focus on maximising the number of transactions per second. Scaling carries certain costs to bear. The first thing which some people tend to sacrifice in favour of raw speed is decentralisation. But those of us who understand Bitcoin do not want to sacrifice decentralisation. As bitmover said, being in control of your funds and not having barriers to transact with other users is vital. Those are not qualities we would ever want to lose.

If you think TPS is the only important thing, that's your prerogative, but you'll find that many won't agree with that. And because Bitcoin is consensus based, the people who value decentralisation will continue to run the code that preserves decentralisation. If people wanted what you want, that wouldn't be the case. This puts you in the minority, which is not generally known for being a position where you get to assert your preference on development.

did you ever read books? did you ever learn something before you say load of shit which have none sense and around experts blockchain they will laugh on you weeks if not months...

TPS its the most important metric and also satoshi team said this which school you was because you need to be fucking crazy and super dumb to say the shit you say.

mic drop here , but if your logic inside your ass then you fucked up in your entire life...

1. bitcoin can hold max 10 transcation per second and ethereum little bit more nothing fancy, you will go to store to buy something with crypto and wait 10 -20 min for conformation, dude you fucking crazy and i mean it.

do you or the store will wait 10-20 min for conformation? Huh

? read it twice

now this shit come if all the cars only in the usa will use crypto to fuel/gas they cars we need huge monster protocol which can handle huge amount of transction per second to take over visa and and other giants.

now cars its only one vertical, what with stores and other things, all this transcation happen in the same second,

ask any experts in blockchain/cryptography and satoshi team also said the problem will be scaling...

bitcoin cannot be main stream faggot , its only hold max 10 transcation per second even small super market it dosent hold the same with ethereum and bunch others.

2. now about decentralization, bitcoin miners are in the hands of few giants around the world did you know it and yes its still decentralized but no everybody have the money to buy all the equipment to mine and be profitable like giants which make it less decentralized.

which mean bitcoin will never accpeted in stores and other vertical because the conformation is to much long?? how it will go main stream??

if you cannot understand this you far away from the ball park and even dont have grasp in simple things which kids understand.

shame with people like you with huge metrit and five shitty stars which the the most basic things dont understand.

tps its the most important metric every experts blockchain know this, fuck even answer you i feel dumb