That's not plagarism lol I quoted the article then commented on it. I have missed the closing " on the quote, but if you guys play a closer look you will see this is the case.
Now that you know the reason for the ban, can you admit now that those are copy-pasted? Or are you still going to defend the the other two comments presented by @dikul and @asu ?
Yes, I do admit that I quoted articles, didn't know it was such big deal and forbidden to comment on articles. I was not aware of that, neither did I get a warning. Banning me right away is way too harsh and unfair.
Wrote many times to the appeal email no answer whatsoever. I wouldn't argue if I was spamming on PM, but come on, this punishment is exaggerated. Dude, quit lying. That first example clearly showed plagiarism with malicious intent.
The reason for the ban - plagiarism:
Since July long term chart was showing downtrend which looking to be reversed. That was not something to be worried about because decline in its price was anyway because this is one of the very few markets where people hedged against the volatility. This has defined its future direction with long lasting overall positive performance. NEM looks ready to start new rally upon confirming of stability in market as whole.
Since July long term chart was showing downtrend which looking to be reversed. That was not something to be worried about because decline in its price was anyway because this is one of the very few markets where people hedged against the volatility. This has defined its future direction with long lasting overall positive performance. DGB looks ready to start new rally upon confirming of stability in market as whole.
That's not a case of quoting someone, you've just copied another member's post and changed the coin mentioned in that member's post.
The ban is completely justified, you're not in some sort of gray area at all.