ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?
If they are limited in concept and do not have clear references, then how is it possible that they are going to reach hard cap, investors are wiser now, they will not invest on an ICO that lacks concept and references when there are a lot of ICO to choose from.