I think it can be summarized as follows:

There are 1) the TA principles to master and 2) market knowledge. Both areas are subject to human trading errors.

If we automate 1) then we should eliminate errors in 1).

If we however use Socrates for 1), we are fooling ourselves because then errors in 1) cannot be eliminated because Socrates is subject to human interpretation to an extreme extent. Instead of eliminating the human error component, we would be introducing multiple new sources and types of human error. This drives people insane because Socrates cannot even be understood because of the ambiguities / lack of consistent rules. Therefore, Socrates is not suitable.

In other words: I would ask Martin Armstrong: When are you going to computerize Socrates analysis? And I am serious about it.

Or in yet other words you cannot keep an intelligent person in a Socrates support function for long because that person will be driven insane.
Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.