The admins at Bitcointalk should have several IP addresses from Satoshi, because the IPs are saved in the logs. They are in the Database somewhere!
Why not revealing them?
Why not revealing them?
Bitcointalk = Satoshi
Indeed.
One interesting angle that I was investigating, in this regard ...
- http://www.hosterstats.com/historicaldns.php?domain=bitcointalk.org
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5151045.msg51381164#msg51381164
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5151045.msg51379174#msg51379174
Note: Registration's prior to these server / domain migrations are also possible ...
Can't post the links here at present, but if you search 'related' IP, domains, dns and server 'registrations' via the wayback machine etc., one thing that I noticed is that multiple instances of the 2008 and/or 2009 data is 'missing', when it is otherwise present for pre / post years.
Remember: GeoIP often changes year on year etc., (having MaxMind GeoIP data from 2008, 2009 helps) however, what my research does tell me is that all of this was done to cover ones tracks from the offset! It is an unlikely coincidence. Did we expect any less from 'Satoshi'?
...
Also see here:
Whois Satoshi? Known Satoshi IP addresses? ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155191
Clearly more 'lies' from CSW though!
...
"Finding (Not) Satoshi" ... is/was a Cypherpunk game!