Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
AnonymousCoder
on 29/07/2019, 05:54:47 UTC
...
What I care about is if someone sells me something or a product then I expect and demand that the service or product does as claimed.
If not then that person or company has an obligation to prove it does what It says it does or to instruct the purchaser on the correct use of that service or product.
MA does nothing to rectify, prove otherwise nor instruct his subscribers in any way shape or form.
...

Thanks for putting the Socrates quality of service into the right focus. The disclaimer on the Socrates home page is no excuse for the extreme failures I had to deal with. That is not acceptable for a product that is charged for at zero discount.

There is so much disrespect of the users. There is no road map, no list of open issues, no release schedule. There is simply no parallel in the software market / industry for the lack of everything. The word sub-standard would already be aiming too high because it would imply that some kind of measurement of this contraption was even possible with respect to any standard.

So when I look at what is being delivered, and what was delivered during the previous version of Socrates, then my conclusion inevitably is that Martin Armstrong suffers from delusion of grandeur while at the same time being incompetent in the field of basic software development and ignorant of the minimum requirements of any deliverable that he is charging for. Conclusion and recommendation: Don't touch Martin Armstrong's products, whatever they may be.

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for a reason.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.