That is the great news,
Will you use PoW only for the super block control ? or Using PoS also ?
PoW only, please see the update in my post.
AND, one more basic issues
This coin will be changed to 1024 fixed rewards ?
If not,
the cheating miner will mining between 1536 ~ 2048 chance only, it will makes 20~25% more gain,
If yes,
the reward concept will be changed too much ?
I need to discuss this with bosian.
Anyway,
I have been simulated the super block only mining suing simple batch file with the blocknotify option,
and, I found it is very easy to do the selective mining,
and, better than continous mining
such as
(1) I have put, blocknotify=\hash.bat into conf file
(2) and, I have calcuate the super block chance
(3) if super block chance, I have been mining this coin
(4) if not, I have been mining the other coin
the average reward for the continous mining with 2MHs, 160GRA/minutes
superblock mining with 2MHs, 550GRA/minuts
(5) I have dump the block information using getblocktemplate, and use the coinbase,
(6) I have mining when the coin chance is higher than 1500, or super block
the aveage rewards for the selective mining with 2MHs, 196GRA/minutes
I hope you can resolve more firm and reliable way
And, it is the common problem for ALL random reward coins,
It is the good chacne to show this coin is superior than the other coin,
The block reward for any PoW may be moved to the next block to prevent this, but this will increase the blockchain size significantly.
Some extra issues,
(1) the block time of this coin
(2) too many orphans with some ratio between PoW/PoS diffs
(3) threading for PoS mining (and/or better PoS mining)
(4) block time reference in the three
1) doubling the block time would not solve the problem. Significantly larger increase would completely change the characteristics of the coin.
3) What means better PoS mining? What could be done better there? I don't think that running several PoS threads would increase your income from PoS mining.
4) What you mean?