He is (by far) the least trusted person on the entire forum
The trust of who did I breach and how?According to this brain wash story, I am the least trusted person on this forum without ever breached the trust of anyone?
You can be distrusted without having to "breach the trust" of someone. People get the general vibe that you are untrustworthy, and as seen with your handling of this customer's complaint, they are sometimes proved correct.
1) Believing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money means not knowing!
2) Not knowing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money confirms that this is not the case. Because if it was the case, some bitcointalk accounts surley would know it considering how much effort they have put in within the past 3,5 years to lie about and defame Game Protect!
3) Therefore, (at least based on real world rules and logic) everyone who believes that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money confirms that this is not the case!
2) Not knowing that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money confirms that this is not the case. Because if it was the case, some bitcointalk accounts surley would know it considering how much effort they have put in within the past 3,5 years to lie about and defame Game Protect!
3) Therefore, (at least based on real world rules and logic) everyone who believes that anyone dealing with Game Protect is at a high risk of losing money confirms that this is not the case!
Again, this is not how these words work. Just because somebody doesn't "know" something for sure doesn't mean its not true. You can believe something is true without knowing for sure that it is. That's why they are 2 different words. If you keep repeating this illogical premise as logical then it will just be another feather in your insanity cap.