Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Bounty cheater
by
KTChampions
on 30/07/2019, 17:17:43 UTC
....................................
Duh. Every scammer I catch is trying to attack me personally.
As I wrote above for a better understanding of this mechanism, read the topic from the beginning to the end. Notice who ended up right. johhnyUA is present in this topic and (surprise) of course he protects the scamer.
He was not right in that case. The fact that he found evidence, much later than the allegations, is a fact. He did not prove corruption. He made accusations that he could not prove. He distorted information several times.

Anyone can read the entire topic or part (about you) and draw independent conclusions.

Those cases in which he found evidence do not change the fact that he harms the Russian section of the forum on Bitcoin. And he knows where to attack. I regret that in the Russian section there are people who lead a double life. However, this does not mean that he is right in all his statements.

Of course, you regret that I was able to prove the guilt of some scammers, because you protect them.

I do not understand the bounty and the broadcast system, so I can not and do not want to check this information.

Soooo unexpected!  Grin
For some reason, you don’t tag some scammers even when they personally confess to fraud.
Example:
~
And I still don't see your tag on Smart man for any of these points.
1.) Mass account trading.
2.) Merit abuse.
3.) Bumping /shilling.
4.) Offering bumping service.
5.) Plagiarism (many accounts from his farms are banned for plagiarism).
6.) Participation in the obvious scam projects.
7.) Account farming.

Points 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 are confirmed by his own words.

In the Russian section, as in any other, there are many abuses. The fact that he finds them is like sand on the beach to show everyone. But some of his actions are harmful. Not he alone conducts investigations. For example, I found a lot of plagiarism, but I do not show my work to everyone, raising my rating, because my goals are not the same as his. Taking into account the facts of abuses cited by him, I do not trust him and I consider him a dangerous person.

You did not cite a single fact. Only your regrets and lies.