I do agree that the certain people should be removed from this campaign. Bob123 for example has admitted to intentionally deceiving someone in order to cause harm to the person by exposing what he knew was secret information. Chipmixer has a business model that relies upon their customers trusting them with confidential information (the link between the inputs and outputs), and I dont see why anyone would trust Chipmixer to do this if they are paying someone like bob to advertise for them
I am starting to get annoyed by your attempts to discredit me as well as damaging my reputation.
How many threads did you hijack with your baseless claims already? 4 ?
Unfortunately it seems that in order to not get discredited by you, i have to answer in each of them.
Let's make this short:
1. I did not expose
secret or confidential information.
2. The seller was offering hacked accounts.
3. This - admittedly unethical - action has lead to 2 accounts being returned to their original owner, preventing damage to the buyer of the accounts and (more importantly) the legitimate and original owner of them.
If you want to call '
returning hacked accounts back to the original owner by deceiving the hacker/seller' as intentionally causing harm.. then this is your point of view.
But stop posting some baseless claims - completely out of context - in threads not dedicated to this topic.
I do understand, that you - as
#4 of the least trusted members here and an account farmer / seller - hate me with your full passion.
However.. if you still have something to say regarding this topic, use the two threads already existing.