While I don't disagree with anything in the article it is simply a restating of what is "wrong" with the crypto-currency movement without any agenda or plan to improve it. There author says there should be more focus on education. Ok. I don't think many people will argue with that. So what is the authors plan? Is this article the launching of the first in a twenty part education video aimed at crypto-currency novices? No. The author proposes and has done nothing to provide education.
On the other hand you have people like Andreas who simply decided (without the need for self aggrandizing speech about what is wrong) to start actually ... educating people.
One article, one podcast, and one tv appearance at a time. His large number of podcasts and articles got him invited to speak at conferences and that has led to media outlets asking him to speak on the air.
Most recently:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ1yWihBNA4I will take one Andreas over 100,000 articles linked in the OP. Did the author in the article forget about people like Andreas or was it just not convenient to the narrative, which paraphrased is "Bitcoin sucks and only I can see it"?