Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
olegrey
on 01/08/2019, 14:26:19 UTC
...
Here is a link to a spreadsheet with hypothetical trading performance
...

You are going to fail.

I think I can say that because I provided the data in that spreadsheet.

But you are not going to fail because of that. You are going to fail because it is Armstrong's data.

And Armstrong's data is bad because he does not know what he is doing.

Martin Armstrong does not know what he is doing and that is why his trades are losing trades

And because Socrates suggests losing trades, that is why it is on the web making money by getting subscription money out of your pocket. THAT IS THE REAL TRADE AND IT IS A WINNING TRADE

I really laugh my head off how after so much intense reporting and in-depth analysis of this phenomenon some people still cannot resist.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud

See https://armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog

In depth reporting? Are talking about your laughable 1 time frame analysis.  Or your phatom reversals that were debunked by the reversals being in the dashboard as pointed out by alex.

Why we're you willing to share the data with bikefront, but not with me?