...
Here is a link to a spreadsheet with hypothetical trading performance
...
You are going to fail.
I think I can say that because I provided the data in that spreadsheet.
But you are not going to fail because of that. You are going to fail because it is Armstrong's data.
And Armstrong's data is bad because he does not know what he is doing.
Martin Armstrong does not know what he is doing and that is why his trades are losing tradesAnd because Socrates suggests losing trades, that is why it is on the web making money by getting subscription money out of your pocket.
THAT IS THE REAL TRADE AND IT IS A WINNING TRADEI really laugh my head off how after so much intense reporting and in-depth analysis of this phenomenon some people still cannot resist.
Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud
See
https://armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog
@AnonymousCoder... You've added a lot of value and done well at exposing the serious and multiple flaws in MA/Socrates.
In order for this to gain more traction and broader recognition then people need to be able to evaluate and come to the same conclusion. As was the case with so many people already on this blog who have studied, attempted, and seen the holes in the system and MA's commentary.
Assisting them in that process is the best way of achieving wider acknowledgement as opposed to a combative angle.