Well that's kind of backwards. You get to guess for your first few hundred reported posts, then we tell you what we think is good and what we think is bad.
I would like to think that after 300 good reports I would have figured it out.
I think the reasoning is that:
a. it's not a problem if someone makes a bad report, as one correct report is worth many bad ones;
b. if every user could see which of their reports are bad/good/unhandled, it could create a bigger burden on mods, Global mods and admins with questions why their report was handled the way it was.