Just because you have an indefensible position on some issues doesn't mean I've been using 'wordplay'.

The truth is you believe homosexuality is 'good' and paedophilia is wrong and you can't articulate why.  You can't articulate it because you don't know.  Your positions are based on emotions.  You feel homosexuality is no problem because that is what the wider society is telling you, and because you think nobody gets hurt because it's consensual.

You are repulsed by paedophilia and rightly so.  But the only argument you have against it is consent.  Every other argument used in favour of homosexuality ("It's inbred!", "Everyone has the right to love whomever they want!") can also be applied to every other type of activity.  So you're confused by your own position.

Nanaimogold may not be the most polite poster when sharing his views, and it may not be good for his business (or maybe it is, what do you care?  Mind your own business).  But he does hold a position that is consistent with almost every non-declining society in history and almost every major world religion.  I realize that means nothing to you because you create your own morality and defer to no outside authority, but it at least means that within the scope of human history you are in the minority, so there is more onus on you to explain your innovative morality than on him to defend his.

And when we have posts like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=41627.msg511058#msg511058, bitcoin2cash reveals his true colours.  He mocks people who have been abused as children, and sub-consciously connects nanaimogold's pretend victimhood with his current opinion on homosexuality.  If nanaimogold himself had asserted that was the origin of his views all you liberals would have been climbing all over him.