I agree. The price of AQU for the ICO was too high. But this happened with any cryptocurrency that is being put into circulation. This is a global issue for any cryptocurrency. Somewhere I read the statement of some famous economist. He said that the price of any coin or token, for any project that has not yet launched the finished product, should be calculated by the formula:
The number of dollars collected during the ICO / The number of tokens in circulation = The initial price of the token
Thus, now AQU should have a price of about $ 0.11.
After the finished product (launch of the platform) is released, the price of the token should be regulated by the supply and demand for this token, as well as other factors that may affect the price.
In my opinion, this is the optimal solution to the global cryptocurrency valuation problem. But how to implement this proposal and whether it will ever be implemented is unknown.
By the way, did you read the previous post (before your post)? Interesting information. aQuest illegally sells AQU tokens on the IDEX exchange using intermediary wallets. And this is clearly seen from the evidence. Thus, aQuest illegally sold about 25% of all AQUs that are currently in circulation. I'm sorry, but aQuest is not only illegally enriched by the illegal trade of AQU, but also independently and illegally increased inflation by 25% (including by reducing the price of AQU by 25%). It is bitter when you see that many projects are doing everything to reduce inflation and even periodically burn some of the tokens that are in circulation. It’s bitter that projects such as aQuest are willing to illegally and almost for free sell their additional tokens for a penny for the sake of temporary penny, which leads to enormous inflation.