It was an unfortunate event that i was able to join an ICO campaign that was really not good in terms of their management. They are requiring to do the bounty hunters a KYC process as to help them identify the real bounty hunters. Well that is good though and i am confident that i am able to comply in the KYC process. However, a couple of months pass the team requires the bounty hunters to contribute with 0.1 eth and that time I was about to think why when in fact they will do KYC? So i think there is something fishy out there in their ICO and i quit joining bounty campaigns. I posted more than 200 post for them but sad to say my efforts had gone to nothing. I am afraid now to join ICO bounty campaign. Should i quit? Well anyway i found SONDER and this time i am sure that i have joined a good ICO having a live sales which sold million of tokens in their private sales. No question with the success we are almost reaching the soft cap and i am planning also to invest with them as the team told us that our contribution as eth increases so does our tokens. WOw i am really impressed with these ICO. The team are working hard and i am happy and great to be with these team. I finally found the one.
i understand that this is an advert placement of the SUNDER project. However, not all ICO projects turns out to disappooint you as the earlier ones did. that they requested for KYC and you pertook does not in anyway justify you as an eligible owner of their token or even worthy of earning. they always set their rules and regulations in their bounty page and if you do not meet up with it or you loose out of information, then you may not have your tokens. There are also projects who feel that paying bounty hunters is not good for their project as the bounty hunters contribute greatly in the devaluation o ftheir coins and therefore they advices themselves on what should be best for the project