Stone, quit with the bs, you do realize that anyone can easily visit the thread, and view the aforementioned convo in its entirety. He literally stated several time on discord that he made the statement to delist because everyone was fudding and not defending his project. With no care whatsoever about his new investors/ what he was referring to as fud, are either mistakes on his part or generalized agreement within the majority and should be discussed in a civil manner.
 
 Rather he choose to ban a majority of his active member,made a statement about delisiting the coin, which severely dumped the value to his advantage, then turned around and stated that he has no intention to delist. Its all stated on discord, and recorded by me with multiple screen shoot taken for future possible litigation.

  I say litigation cos i know with his temperament, this is just a minor event, and he will commit far more atrocities in the future. So, i find it funny that he keeps screaming about fud, when the biggest fud to occur within this project was perpetuated by him.

 I was exposing a scammer, this didn't impact investors negatively, if anything it placed the spotlight on the scammer's acct and limited his ability to scam others with that account.
 The other members were discussing an issue with the mining code  that distributed the coin in an unfair manner (again did not impact investors negatively) if anything, after having a meltdown and banning most of his members, this lead to him finally fix the issue and make things fair for all miners.

 However, his retort with regards to delisiting drastically affected his investors and some ended up losing a decent amount from that bs, so who is really the fudder in this scenario?