My post was NOT to advocate litigation.
It was to point out that in the case of a centralized coin where 1 person has 100% control, it gets a lot more real than decentralized coins.
In the case of the now it's delisted, now it's not, a lot more forethought should have gone into the whole process and final decision.
Want to delist, fine. Discuss with exchange FIRST, explore options, and then put out a final statement. That's the way real business decisions are made. Not flip flopping in a matter of 2 days.
And the way the things have progressed with the coin, it IS a business now, especially with the 5% dev fee. At least in the US would be seen that way. Not sure in France. It doesn't matter if it's registered or not. If you treat it as a business, then in most jurisdictions it is.
Am not advocating for litigation immediately, just collecting detailed info and slowly building a case cos i know with his temperament, he is bound to make multiple similar mistakes, and in time is bound to commit a financial crime that can thoroughly get him sued/reported to the authorities. At least, his identity is public and its easy to secure all info related to him. So, now its basically a waiting game to let his temperament/morals do all the work.